- with OpenOffice Draw (open
- OpenOffice.org includes the
- OpenOffice Draw (and the
- bar of your Draw window.
- Example 3 – A Workflow or
- standalone OpenOffice Draw
- 07/31/2008. cocktail
- Open office Draw
- of OpenOffice.org Draw
- OpenOffice.org 3.0 Beta Rocks
- To start OpenOffice.org Draw
- 編輯 軟體 openoffice org .
- of Draw#39;s snap functions.
- With OpenOffice.org Draw
- ODF Support – OpenOffice.org
- of export from Draw.
- Using OpenOffice Draw:
- Thus, a repost of this Draw
- OpenOffice Draw Functions
images Open office Draw 
wallpaper with OpenOffice Draw (open
2011 OpenOffice.org includes the
more...
more...
2010 OpenOffice Draw (and the
more...
hair bar of your Draw window.
more...
hot Example 3 – A Workflow or
more...
house Using OpenOffice Draw:
tattoo standalone OpenOffice Draw
more...
pictures 07/31/2008. cocktail
dresses 編輯 軟體 openoffice org .
more...
makeup of OpenOffice.org Draw
girlfriend With OpenOffice.org Draw
hairstyles To start OpenOffice.org Draw
Source URL: https://juffryjeanses.blogspot.com/2011/07/openoffice-draw-30.html
Visit juffry jean for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
bigboy007
08-24 10:45 PM
This is a contract position to work in canada.This is normally through couple of vendors.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
wallpaper with OpenOffice Draw (open
Blog Feeds
09-08 09:50 AM
San Diego Immigration lawyer informed that the Department of Homeland Security, USCIS has submitted the information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2009, at 74 FR 27339, allowing for a 60-day public comment period. USCIS did not receive any comments for this information collection. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comments. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until October 2, 2009. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and suggestions especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer. Comments may be submitted to: USCIS, Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC 20529-2210. Comments may also be submitted to DHS via facsimile to 202-272-8352 or via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202-395-5806 or via oira_ submission@omb.eop.gov.
We suggest when submitting comments by e-mail please make sure to add OMB Control Number 1615-0035 in the subject box. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/uscis_issues_extension_of_info.html)
Written comments and suggestions especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer. Comments may be submitted to: USCIS, Chief, Regulatory Products Division, Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC 20529-2210. Comments may also be submitted to DHS via facsimile to 202-272-8352 or via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202-395-5806 or via oira_ submission@omb.eop.gov.
We suggest when submitting comments by e-mail please make sure to add OMB Control Number 1615-0035 in the subject box. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/uscis_issues_extension_of_info.html)
arc
08-10 10:00 PM
Hello
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
2011 OpenOffice.org includes the
edaltsis
09-19 01:33 PM
"THIS IS NOT A COMPLEX SITUATION" - Consider changing the subject.
Absolutely, she can go for stamping in India with your H1B approval and get it stamped. If she were in US, based on your H1B approval she will get an Dependent approval notice and a new I-94, she still needs H4 visa to travel.
If you file for H1B renewal in regular process it might take more time, so if you are in a hurry then go for Premium.
Absolutely, she can go for stamping in India with your H1B approval and get it stamped. If she were in US, based on your H1B approval she will get an Dependent approval notice and a new I-94, she still needs H4 visa to travel.
If you file for H1B renewal in regular process it might take more time, so if you are in a hurry then go for Premium.
more...
shaikhshehzadali
07-08 05:52 PM
In case anyone needs to reimburse some of the medical costs from the insurance co, following are the HIPAA procedure codes.
Testing / Lab HIV-1 and HIV-2 86703
Testing / Lab Syphilis test (RPR) 86592
Preventive Care PPD (tuberculosis) intra-dermal skin test 85680
Preventive Care MMR immunization (subcutaneous) 90707
Preventive Care Varicella immunization 90716
Preventive Care TD immunization (Tetanus) 90718
Are u a doctor?
Testing / Lab HIV-1 and HIV-2 86703
Testing / Lab Syphilis test (RPR) 86592
Preventive Care PPD (tuberculosis) intra-dermal skin test 85680
Preventive Care MMR immunization (subcutaneous) 90707
Preventive Care Varicella immunization 90716
Preventive Care TD immunization (Tetanus) 90718
Are u a doctor?
jliechty
June 12th, 2006, 05:48 PM
I wish that the closest strawberries, which happen to be the brightest ones that draw attention, could be in better focus. Using a smaller aperture would bring more of the berries into focus. Otherwise, I really like the photo. Good job! :cool:
more...
mk26
03-30 08:33 AM
Once you take appointment you can call the same consulate and sned required documents and get PIMS verified.
2010 OpenOffice Draw (and the
Pagal
07-05 03:28 AM
Hello,
There are many approved evaluation services that would provide you with certification of your MSc as compared to US programs like World Education Services - International Education Intelligence (http://www.wes.org)
Please be aware about rip-offs on the web who may not be the approved agents...good luck!
There are many approved evaluation services that would provide you with certification of your MSc as compared to US programs like World Education Services - International Education Intelligence (http://www.wes.org)
Please be aware about rip-offs on the web who may not be the approved agents...good luck!
more...
Blog Feeds
07-13 12:48 PM
USCIS has recently published a new fact sheet of common questions and answers for members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families. (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Immigration%20Information%20for%20Members%20of%20t he%20U.S.%20Armed%20Forces%20and%20their%20Familie s.pdf) The fact sheet contains the most frequently asked questions that USCIS receives.
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
The fact sheet is worth reading if you are in the Armed Forces because the answers to some of the questions are different (and usually more advantageous) to members and/or dependents of those in the Armed Forces. For instance, if you are a civilian, obtained your green card through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen and you have been married for less than two years, you must file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f858d59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD) to remove the conditional residence and obtain your permanent green card. You must file this form even if you intend on applying for citizenship a year later. (Persons who are married to U.S. citizens may apply for citizenship in three years.)
Members of the armed forces do not have to file Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence to remove conditional residence obtained through a marriage to a U.S. Citizen, if the foreign born spouse was inducted or enlisted in the military and is applying for naturalization based on qualifying military service. Thus, military personnel are permitted to "skip a step" and do not need to file form I-751.
Additional questions and answers and helpful email addresses to USCIS liaisons are included on the fact sheet.
http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/father%20and%20son.jpg
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/07/immigration_information_for_me_1.html)
hair bar of your Draw window.
linklinklink
06-22 04:40 PM
Both my daughter and I have her old I-94 number on our new I-94s. They did not put my old I-94 number on my new I-94.
more...
H1B-GC
05-28 05:06 PM
Have you done any homework before asking these questions? Have you called the unemployment office to inquire about her eligibility?
To answer your question,
Yes, it is OK to provide A#. Without the A# they will not be able to check on her immigration status.
You would qualify for Unemployment in PA as long as there is a pending green card application.
Offcourse the applicant should have earned income in the previous year to qualify.
I would highly advise you to contact the unemployement office in your local city and explain your situation and get their advise.
Thanks for your advise! I will check at the local unemployement office !
To answer your question,
Yes, it is OK to provide A#. Without the A# they will not be able to check on her immigration status.
You would qualify for Unemployment in PA as long as there is a pending green card application.
Offcourse the applicant should have earned income in the previous year to qualify.
I would highly advise you to contact the unemployement office in your local city and explain your situation and get their advise.
Thanks for your advise! I will check at the local unemployement office !
hot Example 3 – A Workflow or
jvs
03-19 01:06 AM
You can scan the hard copy using a scanner to get a soft copy. If you don't have a scanner, you can use one at Fedex-Kinko store.
more...
house Using OpenOffice Draw:
zamoo
09-29 11:48 AM
If you indeed resign, there can be trouble..."luck factor" might pay a role.
But, I'm wondering why would you want to resign ? As long as your employer is a reasonably big one and has HR rules, you might be able to take FMLA...I think that can go for as long as 6 months. You will not get paid for a lot of it (depending on you leave balances). But, you will remain employed. And, you can work with your HR and legal folks to arrange a better alternative than resign.
Now, if your employer is a small place, then its all "it depends" thing...
Good luck...see to it that you don't extreme measures unless absolutely needed.
But, I'm wondering why would you want to resign ? As long as your employer is a reasonably big one and has HR rules, you might be able to take FMLA...I think that can go for as long as 6 months. You will not get paid for a lot of it (depending on you leave balances). But, you will remain employed. And, you can work with your HR and legal folks to arrange a better alternative than resign.
Now, if your employer is a small place, then its all "it depends" thing...
Good luck...see to it that you don't extreme measures unless absolutely needed.
tattoo standalone OpenOffice Draw
gc_on_demand
01-08 02:47 PM
Nothing positive? Check this out:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22242
There were those who got their I-140 cleared under EB2 and were practically jumping with joy at the door closing behind them. Some were even taking credit for the move :)
Generally it doesnot help to stop line behind you. But here in USCIS world that may help as people from 2006 got GC before people from 2004-5 . If no people from 2006 were there may be 2004- 05 people may have got their card.
but if new administration makes USCIS to more productive ,closing door behind any one will not help.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=22242
There were those who got their I-140 cleared under EB2 and were practically jumping with joy at the door closing behind them. Some were even taking credit for the move :)
Generally it doesnot help to stop line behind you. But here in USCIS world that may help as people from 2006 got GC before people from 2004-5 . If no people from 2006 were there may be 2004- 05 people may have got their card.
but if new administration makes USCIS to more productive ,closing door behind any one will not help.
more...
pictures 07/31/2008. cocktail
Onesimus
03-01 10:00 AM
@biznuge : Haha, you might be referring "Marcellus Wallace (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gj13ugh5FYw)", btw i also manage to do kinetic/type in motion titled Real Women (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL0PHzv_xqo). Thanks also for the comment!
dresses 編輯 軟體 openoffice org .
ctu
03-29 07:21 PM
i have my stubs till feb 09
more...
makeup of OpenOffice.org Draw
GCVivek
04-20 02:42 PM
Let her come on her own (H1/B2) to the US and then you can apply for spousal visa to extend her stay.
Here's my situation in briefest form. I'm engaged to a woman in the Philippines. She worked as a domestic helper in Kuwait from about 2005 to 2007, a period of about 2.5 years total.
I understand that as we move forward on our K1 application (I'm an American just be clear) she'll be required to submit police reports for anyplace she has lived for more than 6 months. She doesn't have such an item from Kuwait, and it seems nearly impossible to obtain such a report. The websites all say that this document is only given to 'current residents'.
How can we obtain such document, and what if we can't? It seems unfathomable that the US Gov would request a possibly unobtainable document and then permanently deny our chance to live in the US together, if we are absolutely unable to obtain this document?
Does anyone have any advice, or can tell me what happens in a situation such as this?
Thanks for any help.
Here's my situation in briefest form. I'm engaged to a woman in the Philippines. She worked as a domestic helper in Kuwait from about 2005 to 2007, a period of about 2.5 years total.
I understand that as we move forward on our K1 application (I'm an American just be clear) she'll be required to submit police reports for anyplace she has lived for more than 6 months. She doesn't have such an item from Kuwait, and it seems nearly impossible to obtain such a report. The websites all say that this document is only given to 'current residents'.
How can we obtain such document, and what if we can't? It seems unfathomable that the US Gov would request a possibly unobtainable document and then permanently deny our chance to live in the US together, if we are absolutely unable to obtain this document?
Does anyone have any advice, or can tell me what happens in a situation such as this?
Thanks for any help.
girlfriend With OpenOffice.org Draw
WaitingYaar
01-09 09:08 AM
EB3 I-485 filed in May 2007 with PD in 2002
hairstyles To start OpenOffice.org Draw
lonedesi
08-05 12:22 PM
The thread you linked for I-140 delays. I am asking about I-485 approvals :)
I am waiting for my I-485 approval too. So you can change I-140 to I-485 and send the letter to Ombudsman's office.
I am waiting for my I-485 approval too. So you can change I-140 to I-485 and send the letter to Ombudsman's office.
pappu
07-05 01:37 PM
Dude,
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
Pls do not be rude in your responses. How can you expect others to spend time answering your questions if you dont have time for them.
By creating new threads on the same topic you are wasting everyone's time and making it difficult for us to manage the forum. Please understand and spend a few minutes on the forum before you post a question.
I don't have 15 mts time to search on forum. I had a question and I asked, Lasantha promptly answered. And you further wasted my time by writing your expert opinion and now I am wasting my time further replying to you. No hard feelings adios!
Pls do not be rude in your responses. How can you expect others to spend time answering your questions if you dont have time for them.
By creating new threads on the same topic you are wasting everyone's time and making it difficult for us to manage the forum. Please understand and spend a few minutes on the forum before you post a question.
waitingGC
01-10 02:35 PM
The VBs normally come out on Fridays. So this month's VB will probably be on DOS's website this Friday. But I don't see any positive sign for EB movements. We will be lucky if EB2 and EB3 don't retrogress again, according to DOS's hint last month. To be realistic, there won't be any significant movement without any bills favoring immigration passed.
Source URL: https://juffryjeanses.blogspot.com/2011/07/openoffice-draw-30.html
Visit juffry jean for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
No comments:
Post a Comment